Dear Bill Gates,
You Clever Fox By David Leonhardt
You did it.
You casually left a live grenade at the Grand Charity Gala and walked
out of the room to see if anybody, especially Google, will notice.
Once again,
you have created an innovation in marketing that is poised to take the
world by storm. What I love about it is how you have just tossed it out
into the public for all to see, and yet nobody seems to be noticing it.
Flitting from forum to forum, everyone is talking about your new
MSN beta search engine, but nobody seems to have discovered the secret marketing bomb you left ticking there.
Google sure
was clever with its PageRank gimmick. In fairness, PageRank is not just
a gimmick, but it was marketed as much more than it is -- the big
ka-boom that sets Google apart, despite being only a small part of its
algorithm.
But your
ka-boom will be bigger. You have actually given searchers like me
control over my own rankings. While other search engines are talking
about "personalized search", you've given us the levers to
incrementally change rankings in searches themselves.
You are
probably aware that webmasters are kicking the tires on your new search
engine to see how high they rank. Those who are more adventuresome or
who earn their living understanding (or trying to understand) search
engines are taking some of your special features for a spin. Most of
those features are fairly mundane. Like "links to" (although it might
just be the most comprehensive listing on the Internet – hint to
webmasters) and "language".
But what's this at the very bottom, almost falling off my screen?
Results Ranking.
Hey, this is
cool. I can control the results myself. I can give more weight to
recently-updated sites, which is great when I am following a breaking
story (After the America's Cup, I do not want to find all the pre-race
predictions, for example.). Or I can weight the results in favor of
static pages if I am trying to find again the health information I had
read last time my daughter broke out in blue and green splotches all
over her body.
And you let
me decide whether to weigh heavily exact matches, if I know exactly
what I am looking for, or approximate matches if I know only that the
itchy splotches come from some rare Polar virus transmitted by
stampeding trans-Atlantic penguins.
I even get to
choose to boost rankings for popular sites or, if I'm feeling like a
rebel, for less popular sites. Yes, you have even appealed to my
deepest psychological mood swings. This is really cool.
But what really counts is this: I control MSN!
I can just
imagine the TV ads you have already planned: The ad character (a
student, a construction worker, a nurse?) says, "Move over Bill Gates,
I'm in charge now." The voiceover says, "Search MSN" PageRank will
taste like yesterday's chewing gum.
I decided to find out if I really do control MSN, using one of my client sites. It sat at #3 for its top search term.
I turbo
charged the popularity lever to 100%. Whoa. My client lost a spot. What
does that mean? Somebody who does not rank as highly as my client got a
boost by weighing link popularity higher (and, by extension, on-page
content lower).
This tells me
that my client's on-page content is in good shape. It also tells me
which competitor has the best backlinks to check out.
PageRank was
an effective gimmick for wrapping webmasters and SEO consultants around
Google's fingers. But this results ranking thingy could wrap both the
public and webmasters around MSN's fingers.
Just one word of advice, Bill. Results Ranking? Is that the catchiest moniker you could give it?
Bill, you are
to be congratulated for devising such a clever marketing tool, and for
purposefully leaving it right out in the open like a live grenade
without even a hint that it is there. That is what you did, isn't it?
You did do it on purpose, didn't you?
If not, please let me know, so I can send you my invoice for your next great marketing idea.